为了证明我不是在摸鱼，放一段现在正在写的review

    其实写也不难，但是为了保证质量还是等我搞定眼前的这点事情再说。

    这点东西是objectiveofresearch，这段没什么实际内容给人看看也无关痛痒。

    ...Theobjectiveofthisprojectistodevelopanefficient，robust，adaptive，self-learningsystembyintegratingneuralmechanismsthatgoverndynamicsatmultiplespatial-temporalscalesaslearnedfromtheoreticalneuroscience...

    顺便摘抄几句moreisdifferent里面的段落，也是本书的指导思想：

    Athirdinsightisthatthestateofareallybigsystemdoesnotatallhavetohavethesymmetryofthelawswhichgovernitinfact，itusuallyhaslesssymmetryTheoutstandingexampleofthisisthecrystal:Builtfromasubstrateofatomsandspaceaccordingtolawswhichexpresstheperfecthomogeneityofspacesthecrystalsuddenlyandun-predictablydisplaysanentirelynewandverybeautifulsymmetryThegeneralrule，however，eveninthecaseofthecrystal，isthatthelargesystemislesssymmetricalthantheunderlyingstructurewouldsuggest:Symmetricalasitis，acrystalislesssymmetricalthanperfecthomogeneity

    （对称性破缺第四卷会非常详细地讨论）

    。。

    Foranotherexample，biologyhascertainlytakenonawholenewaspectfromthereductionofgeneticstobiochemistryandbiophysics，whichwillhaveuntoldconsequences.Soitisnottrue，asarecentarticlewouldhaveit(7)，thatweeachshould“cultivateourownvalley，andnotattempttobuildroadsoverthemountainranges...betweenthesciences.“

    （不同层次的学科应该应用不同的研究方法）

    。。

    ThearroganceoftheparticlephysiKcistandhisintensiveresearchmaybebehindus(thediscovererofthepositronsaid“therestischemistry“)，butwehaveyettorecoverfromthatofsomemolecularbiologists

    （粒子物理学家觉得只有粒子物理是物理）

    。。

    Marxsaidthatquantitativedifferencesbecomequalitativeones，butadialogueinParisinthe1920ssumsitupevenmoreclearly:

    FITZGERALD:Thericharedifferent.fromus

    HEMINGWAY:Yes，theyhavemoremoney

    （辩证唯物主义）

    还是建议去读原文献，名字就是moreisdifferent。

    老是有人问我为什么不翻译，首先因为这句话不太好翻译，其次这么著名的思想看看原文才能理解。